Sunday, September 02, 2007

Mallya's leap of faith





Vijay Mallya is undoubtedly the most flamboyant businessman in India. In the Indian press, he is often compared with Richard Branson of Virgin. He leads a colourful life and is a successful businessman. His spirits group- United Breweries- is an industry leader. He also owns ‘Kingfisher Beer’, which is a reasonably known international brand. More recently Mr. Mallya has entered the airline industry. Doing well in this segment will be much more of a challenge as the competitive landscape is extremely tough right now, and the stakes are much higher.


When Mallya’s Kingfisher airlines entered Formula One earlier this year as a sponsor to Toyota F1 team, it seemed to be a good, measured move which would enhance the brand visibility of his airline just as it was about to start services in international routes. But Mallya’s latest move to buy the Spyker F1 team is a much bigger move and an extremely ambitious one. It is to be noted that Mallya will use his own money - rather than involve any of the shareholders of his publicly listed company- for buying and running Spyker. The kind of money involved here is huge. Buying the team will cost around 80 – 90 million euros (450 crore Indian Rupees). In addition to this, the operations of the team will have to be financed. Considering that Spyker is presently a loss making entity (it made a loss of around 30 million euros in the first half of this year), this will be a very costly affair. Moreover, Mallya will be hoping for a turnaround in the team’s fortunes in another 1-2 years. This will be the most difficult part. Teams like Toyota and Honda have proved that money cannot guarantee success in this sport. And anyway, Mallya can never hope to match the budgets of the manufacturer-backed teams.



My guess is that, having entered the deal, Mallya will stick on with Spyker for 2-3 years and control the financial bleeding of the team. He is smart enough not to believe in miracles. He will try and minimize the bleeding of the team financially. He will utilize the 2-3 years to build a well-known brand out of his airline. He will try and bring in an Indian driver and use him to endorse his company. He will also try and make sure that an Indian Grand Prix happens- latest by 2009. At the end of these 2-3 years, Kingfisher Airlines will be known world over and Mallya would’ve achieved his objective. At the end of this period, Mallya will start looking for a good price at which to exit his ‘investment’. Inevitably there will be another corporate entity somewhere which would want to utilize Spyker’s (or whatever it will be called then) services for achieving its own corporate objectives, and the story will continue thus…



Things could go wrong though, if Spyker’s financial bleeding cannot be stopped without severely hampering its competitiveness. Mallya is rich, but he is not stupid. He is not a Roman Abramovich, who is spending his personal fortune on a soccer team to simply amuse himself. Mallya’s move is strictly business oriented. This is a calculated gamble that he is making. He is hoping that the money that he will bleed in Spyker will be compensated by making Kingfisher the airline of choice for flying in and out of India. But this is a risky move since Mallya is totally inexperienced in running an F1 team. I doubt if he has ever owned any motorsport team.



Mallya is going for all or nothing here. He is entering untested waters and the only reward that will justify his risk is if his airline becomes the number one Indian carrier in international routes. Here’s wishing Mr. Mallya best of luck in his leap of faith!



Click Here for more of my views on Formula One

Saturday, September 01, 2007

LIC's MoneyPlus Scam

The image you see here is the brochure used by LIC agents across the country for fooling middle-class people into investing their hard earned money into an investment product through fraudulent means. I am talking about LIC’s Money Plus. It is a highly successful ULIP instrument.


Not for a moment am I questioning the legality or quality of the product itself. What I am appalled with is the ethical standards of LIC’s agents. Typically what happens is that the agent shows this brochure to a prospective customer and talks to him about the ‘indicative’ returns. The brochure seems to suggest that his expected returns will vary from 20% to 30% on an annuated basis. This would mean that an investment of Rs. 30,000 will give you returns in the range of 7 lacs to 34 lacs.

In most cases the prospective customer will not think beyond the boundaries of what is being shown in the brochure. Of course, the agent can back his claim by showing LIC’s record in the past 3 years when the stock market grew exponentially. The possibility of a loss is not suggested anywhere except in the statutory warning about Market Risk which is present in a corner in the finest of prints.

A 20% yearly growth in assets over a 20-year time frame is the kind of growth that hasn’t been attained by the likes of Warren Buffet and Peter Lynch who are among the greatest investors in the world. If ever these guys come to know about the claims made by LIC’s agents…

Only last week, one of my friends fell in the trap of a LIC agent and subscribed to the Money Plus policy. This guy works in a top IT company and is a very intelligent person. If such people can be fooled, then think about people from the lower economic strata like auto rickshaw drivers and the likes. Rs. 10,000 is a significant amount for these guys. But the lure of getting Rs. 30 lacs from an investment of just Rs. 30,000 will be very difficult for them to resist.

The most worrying aspect is that this kind of sales tactics is not an isolated event. I now know atleast three agents who have used this trick. I must say that this has been a very successful method albeit unethical. It seems that whoever knows about the MoneyPlus scheme seems to have a favourable opinion on it, thanks to the lucrative figures mentioned in the brochure.

Needless to say, something needs to be done to stop this unethical practice. The regulators can do their bit by imposing strict restrictions on the commissions paid to insurance agents. More importantly, the LIC should rein in its agents.


The MoneyPlus scheme is now closed for investors and hence no one will now fall for false promises of the LIC agents- but I hope that this article gives investors more wisdom in future when one can expect more such schemes in the market.